I, for one, love Jim Sterling.....
Carry on.
Carry on.
danielrbischoff said:Destructoid is full of s***. They treat their scores like jokes and offer up controversial opinions like prime rib. Look around the internet. NO ONE is giving Kirby's Return to Dreamland a 10 or even close to it.
Now I'm not one to say that reviewers should stick to popular opinion. Quite to the contrary (although I suppose my scores tend to slip in to "popular" territory more often than not). Regardless, no one should manipulate scores to "prove a point."
Let's take a look at this one for example:
http://www.destructoid.com/review-deadl ... 5168.phtml
I know a lot of people enjoyed that game (Longo) but are you f****** kidding me?
Delorean88 said:So been playing BF3 yesterday and today, the campaign is actually enjoyable DICE did good (I only say that since BF hasn't really had singleplayer since Bad Companies), haven't finished it but I feel like I have two or three missions then I'm done. Short but fun campaign. THe multiplayer is amazing, had my first jet battle today and after a number of dog fights later got my first jet kill and felt so accomplished. Flying jets is tough when you don't have counter-measures. Multiplayer wise I think BF3 is more enjoyable than COD but I realize they are two different styles of gameplay but I would find myself playing BF3 for much longer than MW3. Campaign wise I'd have to wait for MW3 to release to compare.
I realize than I just brought up a MW3 vs BF3 thing, I just wanted to mention that one aspect I'm not trying to actually blah blah this or bash blah blah that
Don't get me wrong. He's opinionated and he can be funny, but the scoring is off and at the end of the day it feeds far too many trolls and other internet monsters.Green_Lantern said:I, for one, love Jim Sterling.....
Yeah, but scores like that manipulate the system and hurt developers, publishers, and (more importantly) other reviewers. Even if you love a game, you have to judge it for what it is. Here's an example from my work:TheJx4 said:Reviews should be nothing more than the reviewers opinion of the game. NOTHING ELSE.
That's what that was.
Reviews are glorified nowadays, which is why Metacritic is a plague.
danielrbischoff said:Yeah, but scores like that manipulate the system and hurt developers, publishers, and (more importantly) other reviewers. Even if you love a game, you have to judge it for what it is. Here's an example from my work:TheJx4 said:Reviews should be nothing more than the reviewers opinion of the game. NOTHING ELSE.
That's what that was.
Reviews are glorified nowadays, which is why Metacritic is a plague.
http://www.gamerevolution.com/review/ca ... -of-shadow
If I were really rating the game on my opinion I would have given it an A, but you have to judge everything in the package, including bugs and camera angles and technical faults.
Green_Lantern said:I, for one, love Jim Sterling.....
Carry on.
Eyebrowsbv31 said:NO worries nick, the multiplayer doesn't work anyways.
StickyGreenGamer said:I'm going to be online for the XBox tonight if anybody wants to play. Don't have a mic though.
I'll either be using: TERMINATORxBM or Hoggy Hog2
Be kind, let me know who you are please.
TheJx4 said:You'd be surprised at how well you can work as a team without a mic.
CloacalKiss said:I didn't think this would happen, but I enjoy BF3 more than BC2! DICE has a ways to go before the console versions are right as rain, though. The potential of this game is so high.
TheJx4 said:You'd be surprised at how well you can work as a team without a mic.
As long as your said "team" goes for the objective and not strictly kills. Too many times I'll be playing Conquest and this seems to be the problem, everyone thinking it's TDM. It pisses me off, playing with friends is very recommended when playing Conquest or Rush.