Haha I criticized Tylzen on Skype earlier today about it being 21 minutes of audio, then got bored while listening to it because it's really just a summary of the entire ontological argument from an atheist's point of view and I JUST finished a big debate about it in philosophy this past semester.
The article makes some good arguments, but then again you can go out there and find some pretty damn good rebuttals from the theist philosophers out there too.
Hooray for simply not having a religion (not being atheist and also not being a theist. I'm not agnostic either, since they are the ones who tend to be on the fence about such matters. I simply choose not to believe)!!!!
BUT to preemptively post since I know Stal or Maca or someone else will, let's not steer this into a religious debate. We just had one of those about a month and a half ago.