A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away we used to nominate from the boards. Thus Kaanchtoofan becoming moderator.
During the infamous Console Wars I held on the forums, Kaan got Sony mod rights because he was pro Sony. He then networked himself into GM. It was all the rage on Misc. at the time. I'll go into further detail at a later time.
Let's get something straight. There's no struggle with Lethean and I. This idea that we have serious beef is perpetuated by people who are grasping at putting our friendship in a perspective they can comprehend. Apologizers and sympathizers would do best to stay on the outside looking in because, truth be told, I have always respected Lethean and have always liked him personally because of our history together.
It wasn't even WR who banned me. It was one of the newer, exemplary moderators. Someone too new to know that me and WR go back years and years and years and even more years. Long before you ever thought of logging into Game-Revolution.com, WR and I were going at it. And it wasn't just us. Icepick and WR made an uneasy truce. Icepick should tell us about the time they went playing pool together. God, just imagining those two together is priceless. Maybe they got along because of their shared hatred of Firewall? Firewall was getting all the play from all the chicks online (just Lemondrops aka dobby, and a troll posing as a chick), so it's only fitting that Team Canada find something in common to hate--Firewall. I'll go into further detail at a later time.
WR and I were joking and jabbing at one another. That's what brothers do. Sorry for the butt trauma it may have caused everyone else but we always knew the score with each other. But WR is MIA as of right now, so axe the guy.
also, WR is a big girl. We all know it to be true. He's a Canadian metrosexual, but he's a Canadian metrosexual, so he comes off far more ~metro~ than sexual. Not that there's anything wrong with that! ehh, I'll go into further detail...later time.
People have this idea that everyone with a join date preceding 2005 was active on the boards during this time. It's just not true. A lot of the people with dates prior to 2005 weren't active or have just padded their date by a few years.
Well, what's my point? Only that a few of us can remember what made the GR forums the busiest traffic hub on the site. Not the main page, it was the forums. It's arguable that Crave bought the forums and the community from dUKE, the GR name was just a bonus.
It's easy to see what works and what doesn't. Leaving moderators in power for years or even 1 year is too long.
2 years ago, less than a year ago.
If it's longer than 4 months, switch em out, I say.
New people--and old people--need to believe they'll have a shot at becoming mod if they wanted to. Once you get rid of that incentive, you get rid of a lot of the community.
Maybe you'll say you don't want the users who only post for moderator rights. I'd counter with let's see if the current moderators stick around after having their moderator rights revoked. Some moderators don't even take the time to resign the position. They just leave, admin rights still fully intact as they're quietly walking out the front door. You gotta have more respect for the position if you want the people to have more respect for the position.
everyone but Daniel can go. Actually, let's do it right and give Daniel GM. dude works for GR after all.
The boards elect an oldie but goodie for a 1 year stint serving underneath Daniel. Someone the boards respect. I'd say Used but he's already been on the council for what seems like years now.
Everyone else is replaced. And replaced again once 4 months goes by. Time passes by too slowly around here to go any further than 4 months. A groundswell is what we're shooting for, and a turnover once every 4 months will help speed up the process and energize the base. Once people see that they'll get a shot at becoming admin only 4 months out, they'll sign in to GR for the first time and will join the forums and community just as they did all those years ago. +1 web traffic. +1 accountable users. Have the forums vote on moderators. We're not going to steer you wrong and put someone in who can't handle the position.
Give new people a shot before you lose them. Too many good ones have left. You need to mix it up even if it causes confusion and terror, and throws the forums into anarchy!
Anarchy sells. You can build around Anarchy. You can't build around "2+ years and counting as moderator! Catch me if you can!"
I have GR's best interest at heart, not your title or prestige. It's GR's, not ours. We're the community, and all we've done is take. How's about giving til it hurts? Your move.