Longo_2_guns said:I'd vote no. But I can't vote. Also, this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PgjcgqFYP4
Rekkie7 said:Arg, 5 minutes viewing those "Vote Yes" ads and my head hurts. When do we get the result?
This guy was named correctly. What a fucking douche.Douchebag_Intent said:I voted yes because gays are unatural
dicks r for chick , so it has been and thats all it should ever be.....but i will say i do like that girl on girl porn.
keepithowitis said:This guy was named correctly. What a f****** douche.Douchebag_Intent said:I voted yes because gays are unatural
dicks r for chick , so it has been and thats all it should ever be.....but i will say i do like that girl on girl porn.
And after seeing that commercial, I was thinking, and if people aren't taught about gays/lesbians at that age, what are they going to think when they hear things about it later in elementary school? They need to be educated, and it's people that would vote YES on that like Douchebag here that are f**king up the world.
Douchebag_Intent said:I voted yes because gays are unatural
dicks r for chick , so it has been and thats all it should ever be.....but i will say i do like that girl on girl porn.
Rakon said:Douchebag_Intent said:I voted yes because gays are unatural
dicks r for chick , so it has been and thats all it should ever be.....but i will say i do like that girl on girl porn.
If dicks are for chicks, I assume you never masturbate
Kiristo said:I think the other people who voted yes are worried about being bashed by everyone else, since you guys all seem to have voted no. Despite picking the middle option, I'll give reason. I'd vote yes. Alot of people don't want gays to be married so they don't get the rights afforded to couples. I'm less concerned about that, as I feel homosexuality is just plain wrong. I believe marriage should only exist between a man and woman. If gays want the same rights, we should give them the rights, but instead of being "married" they'd be "butt-buddies". Instead of man and wife, they could be "butt-buddies". This isn't the same as racial or sexuality equality, so I think that that comparison is foolish. It's not "old-fashioned", it's correct. Blacks being slaves was wrong, not "old-fashioned". Yeah, I'm probably homophobic, but more than that it is simply immoral in my view.
-FCM- said:Kiristo said:I think the other people who voted yes are worried about being bashed by everyone else, since you guys all seem to have voted no. Despite picking the middle option, I'll give reason. I'd vote yes. Alot of people don't want gays to be married so they don't get the rights afforded to couples. I'm less concerned about that, as I feel homosexuality is just plain wrong. I believe marriage should only exist between a man and woman. If gays want the same rights, we should give them the rights, but instead of being "married" they'd be "butt-buddies". Instead of man and wife, they could be "butt-buddies". This isn't the same as racial or sexuality equality, so I think that that comparison is foolish. It's not "old-fashioned", it's correct. Blacks being slaves was wrong, not "old-fashioned". Yeah, I'm probably homophobic, but more than that it is simply immoral in my view.
EDIT: Nevermind, this post does all the work for me.