Blame the lack of budget rather than his lack of talent is his only approach it seems. He even referenced Reservoir Dogs, a movie that was minimalist in set pieces and cash, but big on dialogue and presence, so it seems like he doesn't even think about anything that came before him. So, yeah, he doesn't understand much really, especially how to start making movies since getting rich and then making movies doesn't mean you'll know how to, just that you'll have the cash to waste when you could and probably should have been spending time researching, thinking about, and making your own movies, if not for sale, then for practice.
The being pissed off at studios taking over festivals is understandable, but honestly, I know plenty of people that don't know a thing about them and only hear about festivals at all because of the bigger movies going to them, so it could be said that they help attract new audiences to the movies that do make it.
Anyway, can't really solve anything by making ridiculous movies and then complaining that more popular movies beat you. Spend more time making good movies and then maybe people will give a shit and a half about your views.
Ugh, it's all been said, he's ridiculous, just not as flamboyantly so.
I wonder if he got another director to come aboard and work with him in making movies maybe they could wrangle in his silly impulses and he could succeed in making the kinds of movies that he saw as a kid that made him want to make movies himself. (The movie in question that he noted definetely didn't have boobs, buckets and buckets of blood, or any of his other tripe.)
(And did he pick his nose and wipe it on his shirt?)