intoTheRain said:
According the reviews this movie can be nothing short of one of the best movies of all time. I work opening night, but I'll be going as soon as possible afterwards.
Honestly, i think there's a little bit too much hype going on.
It's a great movie, no doubting that, but it's around the same level of goodness as the first Iron Man movie.
The movie is like 3/4 leading up (which feels oddly rushed. How can like 1.5hrs of the movie just to introduce characters be rushed?) to the big battle, which while cool is a little bit of a let down because you get the feeling that a single dude with a couple FN 5-7s with extended mags could do exactly the same job as Thor or Captain America.
There's also the problem of Furys new mobile base.
(light spoilers)
This base is so obviously physics defying that i'm pretty sure the writer dug up sir issac newtons corpse only to cum on its face and call it a 'bitch' before threatening the CG guys to 'just do it' with a gun.
I worked it out just before, and to lift this 'base' we're going to assume it's lighter than an aircraft carrier despite being larger and comfortably being able to accommodate a hulk.
To lift the full weight of furys base, you would need the same lifting capability as 4000 chinhook helicopters.
That means over 1000 megawatts of electricity assuming literally dozens of ridiculously aggressive blades and assuming all the walls are made from cardboard.
Furys thing has 4 motors.
That means that once everything is factored in, you need around 16 of the nuclear reactors that power an aircraft carrier just to lift his base without danger.
Remember how in Iron Man and even Thor everything was specifically set up with a scientific or at least mostly reasonable way for things to exist, like Tonys reactor and the Worm Hole, in Hulk and Captain America they were science experiments seeing if it's possible to change humans?
All the previous movies were mostly based in reality, and then they make a flying aircraft carrier.
