The_Cookster
Regular
BoBzeBuilder said:I don't see the logic in this. Yes, its true that nothing in the span of our knowledge may be absolutely certain, but by analyzing the probability of a situation, it would make sense to come up with a definite conclusion.
How is that applied to an argument where an equal lack of probability comes into play? You can't just cite lack of experience as a reason for improbability.
LinksOcarina said:The only thing that is different is that all of the books, the koran, the bible, the torah, are essentially not real, and are ficticious and just good stories that they wrote.
Ficticious in the sense of not being literally true, or entirely false? What of the reference to Christ Tacitus makes? Either way saying the Torah is untrue is hardly revelationary.