clayman637
Rookie
For me it's too hard to pick one they each have an advantage.
Like JCD said they both have great games and both have some real stinkers.
Our western games have some great story telling and i think they are working hard to innovate rpgs, like character customization, because the standard rpg formula has been recycled to death. Tyrranis
meantioned mixing rpg elements with non-rpg games, like mass effect, thats what i love about western rpgs.
But eastern has the classics, like FF tactics, that pretty much top all of our lists. nothing really beats character driven plotlines filled with challenging boss fights involving fun and sometimes just plain weird skills. OH and eastern has alot of classed-based rpgs and strategy rpgs.
Its a hard decision but ill go with eastern, because that is where my roots lay and the western rpg market is too young still to be considered a contender.
Like JCD said they both have great games and both have some real stinkers.
Our western games have some great story telling and i think they are working hard to innovate rpgs, like character customization, because the standard rpg formula has been recycled to death. Tyrranis
meantioned mixing rpg elements with non-rpg games, like mass effect, thats what i love about western rpgs.
But eastern has the classics, like FF tactics, that pretty much top all of our lists. nothing really beats character driven plotlines filled with challenging boss fights involving fun and sometimes just plain weird skills. OH and eastern has alot of classed-based rpgs and strategy rpgs.
Its a hard decision but ill go with eastern, because that is where my roots lay and the western rpg market is too young still to be considered a contender.
