intoTheRain said:Where do hunters excel? Nowhere.
And they are the most nerfed class in WotLK so far.
Huntards come in DPS wise under Warriors, Rogues, Locks, Mages, Elemental Shammies.
LawnGnome said:intoTheRain said:Where do hunters excel? Nowhere.
And they are the most nerfed class in WotLK so far.
Huntards come in DPS wise under Warriors, Rogues, Locks, Mages, Elemental Shammies.
Actually, hunters hold the #1 dps records for every instance & raid except for the Sunwell. I also don't think they're getting "nerfed" much at all in WotLK. Quite the opposite. The only problem with hunters right now (and in WotLK), is their difficulty to play in arenas. It takes much more skill to play them effectively there compared to other classes. Even still, the top-ranked 2v2 teams have hunters on them.
You just proved that hunters suck at pvp, not pve. They excel in pve and do probably the most damage besides warlocks.intoTheRain said:LawnGnome said:intoTheRain said:Where do hunters excel? Nowhere.
And they are the most nerfed class in WotLK so far.
Huntards come in DPS wise under Warriors, Rogues, Locks, Mages, Elemental Shammies.
Actually, hunters hold the #1 dps records for every instance & raid except for the Sunwell. I also don't think they're getting "nerfed" much at all in WotLK. Quite the opposite. The only problem with hunters right now (and in WotLK), is their difficulty to play in arenas. It takes much more skill to play them effectively there compared to other classes. Even still, the top-ranked 2v2 teams have hunters on them.
no, the top ranked 2v2 teams do not. look it up before you say that. I think there are about 3 out of 100 2v2 teams with hunters on them.
secondly, hunters nerfs are being looked at and it is no longer looking so bad, so im not worried anymore, and tbh i wanst too worried in the first place, just frustrated.
and thirdly, "Actually, hunters hold the #1 dps records for every instance & raid except for the Sunwell.", proof plz. where the hell did u get that info from?
http://www.arenajunkies.com/rankings/2v2/
theres a link to the top 100 2v2 teams... 2 hunters in all.
TheNesMan said:You just proved that hunters suck at pvp, not pve. They excel in pve and do probably the most damage besides warlocks.intoTheRain said:LawnGnome said:intoTheRain said:Where do hunters excel? Nowhere.
And they are the most nerfed class in WotLK so far.
Huntards come in DPS wise under Warriors, Rogues, Locks, Mages, Elemental Shammies.
Actually, hunters hold the #1 dps records for every instance & raid except for the Sunwell. I also don't think they're getting "nerfed" much at all in WotLK. Quite the opposite. The only problem with hunters right now (and in WotLK), is their difficulty to play in arenas. It takes much more skill to play them effectively there compared to other classes. Even still, the top-ranked 2v2 teams have hunters on them.
no, the top ranked 2v2 teams do not. look it up before you say that. I think there are about 3 out of 100 2v2 teams with hunters on them.
secondly, hunters nerfs are being looked at and it is no longer looking so bad, so im not worried anymore, and tbh i wanst too worried in the first place, just frustrated.
and thirdly, "Actually, hunters hold the #1 dps records for every instance & raid except for the Sunwell.", proof plz. where the hell did u get that info from?
http://www.arenajunkies.com/rankings/2v2/
theres a link to the top 100 2v2 teams... 2 hunters in all.
TheNesMan said:Ret pallies, boomkins and feral druids shouldn't be near dps classes. Pallies and druids are hybrid classes and should do everything well, not great. Pure deeps classes like warlocks, rogues, mages and hunters should always be top dps.
Lethean said:TheNesMan said:Ret pallies, boomkins and feral druids shouldn't be near dps classes. Pallies and druids are hybrid classes and should do everything well, not great. Pure deeps classes like warlocks, rogues, mages and hunters should always be top dps.
So a Blizzard employee is wrong? ~_^
"Pure" dps classes will always say druids and paladins shouldn't be near the top of the damage done.
If you spec ret you should be abel to do pretty damn good damage. Just like a fury warrior should be doing good damage if he goes fury, or arms for PvP. (Then again, prot does more damage than both right now - Way to fail Blizz.)
u took out the part about me being edgyLethean said:I don't think they should be top spot. I'm telling you what a blizzard employee said. I just think they should be taken on more raids.
Besides, I was third in total damage done out of 30 for our Eye of the Storm and I'm usually in the top five for AV out of all 80 players. I think ret dps is fine. The thing that needed to be changed was that we needed to be more raid friendly. (I wasn't pointing that out to have an e-peen either. I think anyone who has an epeen in WoW is an idiot. I was simply using it to illustrate my point that ret isn't bad as it stands right now - But the buff it got is a good thing.)
Like I said, don't get all over me for what a WoW dev said.
Lethean said:I'm irritated by the fact anyone can get epics now by basically doing nothing.
.
Lethean said:ZF PuGs SM AH TLDR.
intoTheRain said:mention something thats already been mentioned in another topic.."UHH WE HAVE ANOTHER THREAD FOR THIS ALREADY, LOCKED"
Paradox said:Lethean said:ZF PuGs SM AH TLDR.
somewhere there is a warcraft to english dictionary right? i know this is how a lot of people talk in mmo's apparently, but wow is my first and ive only been playing about a month or so.
still learning.
FrozenBacon said:Of course when I decide to start playing WoW again, they release a huge patch that causes the servers to be down longer than usual. :/
Lethean said:FrozenBacon said:Of course when I decide to start playing WoW again, they release a huge patch that causes the servers to be down longer than usual. :/
Lol..The funny thing is lately the servers have been up right on time or a little before. I think MMOs don't like you for all the cheating you've done on each of them. You whore. STICK WITH ONE! You tease them for a week, tickle them where they like to be tickled, and then find another flight of fancy!