I don't want that to seem antagonistic to anyone personally - it's primarily an observance of a lack of organisation that seems to be yearned for IF the mods are pleading what I believe they are here.
As far as I'm aware, modship hasn't received a 'constitution' since I was mod, and anyone can go off on a frolic of their own. No strict set of dealing with situations is adhered to. No upper limits, no estimates of which to act upon. Just use common sense is the code, really.
This contrasts with how I'm required to oper on irc, for instance. All these things are laid out for me, so you could say it's less tough than modding, as while modding here, you cant point to a detailed rule and say you were within it if you make a contested modding choice. In a lot of internet hierarchies you can.
I'll give an example (not that I don't agree with it at all, seemed reasonable enough to me, it's just illustrative) of Stalfros' actions the other day. He remade a star trek topic that was by then on the second page. Fine? You'd think so, but the truth is I'm sure every one of you can remember topics being closed and linked when further away than these two were. This leads me at least to a bit of confusion. It happens on a number of issues.
I'd suggest bringing some kind of guidelines for modship in, because as Shaft says, it seems like you guys are quite serious. Being that serious isn't something the current way of moderating can accommodate, IMO.