T4C topic: archive worthy?

[LinksOcarina]

Archive them both then, end of debate now right?

 

[Silios]

Archive them both then, end of debate now right?

I second the motion.

 

[TheNesMan]

By the way, pm me your name too.

 

[Bazooka56]

I think the real question is was it close worthy, and the real answer is no.

Somehow agreed.

 

[Frodo_Bag_Feet]

I think the real question is was it close worthy, and the real answer is no.

Somehow agreed.

Thanks for bringing back a third page topic...

In all seriousness, maca are you just going to close the topic and let it die? Archieve it? or reopen it?

T4C and Forum Warfare are part of our history, they defiantly deserve something besides being closed and forgotten.

 

[maca2kx]

Ok I've decided to archive the T4C topic but not the Forum Warfare topic.

Sam

 

[Typewriter]

Ok I've decided to archive the T4C topic but not the Forum Warfare topic.

Sam

Why not?

 

[Longo_2_guns]

ARCHIVE THEM BOTH!!!! Please.

 

[JCD]

Look, there is no point complaining. This decision is final. The Forum Warfare topic was a joke from the start, T4C was not. T4C sparked a huge and mostly fruitful discussion. Forum warfare did not. It is mentioned in GR's wikipedia entry. That should be enough.

 

[malakian]

Clearly in my brain I'm still a moderator, so I'm going to be opinionated too. My suggestion is archiving the GR pedophile topic. It's a bit tasteless on the outset of it but it has some GR history in there that's affected some big names of the chatter zone section. It's exactly the kind of thing people will want to re-read.

 

[Typewriter]

Look, there is no point complaining. This decision is final. The Forum Warfare topic was a joke from the start, T4C was not. T4C sparked a huge and mostly fruitful discussion. Forum warfare did not. It is mentioned in GR's wikipedia entry. That should be enough.

Traitor.