Best title?...Let's save some time and cut the fat, shall we?
Most Annoying Poster √
Most Missed Poster √
Funniest Poster X
Most Helpful Poster X
Least Helpful Poster X
Most Respected Poster X
Least Respected Poster X
Biggest Forum Contributor X
Spammer Award X
On Topic Award X
Peacekeeper Award X
Topic King X
Postwhore X
Most Intelligent Posts X
Non Award (least intelligent posts, rarely makes sense, etc) X
Best Host X
Best Signature X
Worst Signature X
Best Avatar X
Worst Avatar X
Best Veteran X
Worst Poster X
Best Poster X
Everything in green we can keep. The other awards are pointless. There were five new topics in three months, and only two of them were good. Do we really want to encourage this behavior with an award?
please, if you care, the least you could do is add an asterisks and an explanation of what these categories really mean in the 2010 GR:
Postwhore = you posted 4 times in one day. Automatic win if 5 in one day
Funniest Poster = you made yourself laugh
Most Helpful = You edited out your typos
Least Helpful = You made a topic pointing out someone else's typos
Best poster = you kept your mouth shut for the betterment of everyone involved
Worst poster = Ugh, so no contest
Worst and Best avatar = we've been using the same avatars since 1983
same for Signatures and Hosts...It's always the same avatar, sig, and host.
Most Respected? For what exactly?
Least Respected? Again, for what exactly? no content found, so...
Spammer Award? What spam? :eek6: 5 topics in 3 months
Post King = ?????????????
And the rest are too throw away to even mention. There's about 10 active members left. We have more categories than active members. Am I the only one who notices this? I have to blame the people in charge. Wait, who's in charge again?
This is horse shit!