Lethean said:
...you'll find that violence has increased towards women.
Violence
where? Because I'm pretty sure there are many places that are proud of the fact that violence against women is decreasing. The problem we have in what I assume you to identify as America or someplace similar is that I can't just ask the internet how many women got raped yesterday. I can only find out about
reported offenses, and even then, does that mean it happened? You see how this is unreliable information. To be fair, this also means that I have no data to the contrary.
Lethean said:
You really think there's no correlation between the numerous films of the 70s, 80s and today that show men over powering women [. . .] with no negative repressions in the real world?
I would say there's more damage to be done by films in the 50s and earlier, with their depiction of the roles and character of women. Those issues are often out of focus, and not necessarily appropriately addressed (not that they have to be).
Lethean said:
I am not blaming these movies for the increase - I blame the individual.
This is precisely why films shouldn't be picked out of the pile. Related to what madster said, why do you get to decide what's a catalyst for people who are pre-disposed to violence? If some dude walks in on his parents doing some freaky bondage setup and runs off thinking it's cool to do that to anyone, are you going to strike that from the list? What about a friend who has to force-feed a cat antibiotics? That's a seriously rough struggle; are we going to remove that, too? It becomes one of these all-or-nothing situations, to me. Either you agree that films have a role in part, in which case you convict all things of having a part, or you make that a null statement and leave it.
madster111: Yeah, Law and Order episodes are based off of real cases, and unfortunately that does seem to happen quite a lot.
Lethean said:
I just am astonished that no one here seems to think that violence towards women in films may alter someone's perception of how women should be treated.
No, I don't think that I want to claim that. If seeing that on screen doesn't make you think
anything about what's going on right in front of you, then there's something wrong. I just don't identify it as the
cause.
Lethean said:
Sightless and yourself will think that it's a proven fact I'm wrong, I'll think there's a correlation between the two. Unfortunately there is no way for either of us to prove what we're trying to say so we should probably just move on.
I apologize if I come off as aggressive. I genuinely enjoy having my position questioned, so I'm just trying to tease out an argument. I think we can talk about ideas perfectly fine without appealing to hard facts (I'm an anti-realist anyway, so what are facts?).
Hi Wicked, Hi Liquid! You are both perfectly insane, and Scream 4 will have some great throwbacks to classic horror films such as.... Scream.