Mod-Chip
Rookie
Insomuch as every topic that I make inevitably ends up becoming locked, I'd like to open up a discussion as to the procedures that go into it.
More specifically, there are two things that seem to occur:
1. A topic gets locked, but no explanation is given. This is problematic because it immediately disallows the user(s) from identifying the actions that warranted the closure, and subsequently prevents them from improving their posting habits (i.e. learning)
2. When disagreements occur, there is a higher propensity for a topic to become locked. Why is this? If anything, differences in opinion provide optimal ground for more interesting discussion to take place. Of course, if disagreements are simply ad hominem attacks a la 3rd grade insults, then no doubt should such chaos be terminated. But if disagreements provide added layers of complexity to an argument, then shouldn't we promote this rather than extinguish it?
What do you think?
-BBK
More specifically, there are two things that seem to occur:
1. A topic gets locked, but no explanation is given. This is problematic because it immediately disallows the user(s) from identifying the actions that warranted the closure, and subsequently prevents them from improving their posting habits (i.e. learning)
2. When disagreements occur, there is a higher propensity for a topic to become locked. Why is this? If anything, differences in opinion provide optimal ground for more interesting discussion to take place. Of course, if disagreements are simply ad hominem attacks a la 3rd grade insults, then no doubt should such chaos be terminated. But if disagreements provide added layers of complexity to an argument, then shouldn't we promote this rather than extinguish it?
What do you think?
-BBK