If so, what do you think about it? I know it's been done before many times, especially by them, but this on looks like they put a lot of thought into it and took a lot of factors into consideration. Based on your guys' philosophies I've observed so far I'm assuming you think lists, ones ranking games of all time in particular, are stupid, but I was just wondering what your opinion on it was. I think it's an okay list. Problem is they make a point of not putting on games that came out in the past year to offer perspective, but the list is littered with games that came out the year before or not all that long ago that just aren't all that enduring. Resident Evil 4 is great and everything, but look at all the games it beat. 10 of all time? Really? And Half Life 2 at 6? Was it really number 6 good? I think that's the question they forgot to ask. http://top100.ign.com/2007/ There it is if you wanted to check it out.