You know the little box with the "+" and "-" at the end of your review? Do you base what grade the game will receive' off of that, or is that box just naming some positives, and negatives? I'm just curious. Now type up the answer to that question, then after you've posted (no editing now) read this next part! Now if you've posted you may read this next part. To start off...honestly wtf. We all know NO game's perfect, but this is just stupid! http://www.gamerevolution.com/review/xb ... an_andreas Yea you put a negative for "Restarting missions is never fun." No really, Joe? Jeeze. Is this just you trying to bring the game down some way, so GR will never have an A+ Let's look at another example/comparison. http://www.gamerevolution.com/review/n6 ... na_of_time Duke's review for Zelda. He gave a negative for "Mediocre MIDI music." Which is fine. A complaint on the music makes a game from being perfect. A complaint on a personal problem however DOES NOT. "Restarting missions is never fun" Guh. Honestly. Do better! Huh, huh, huh? We all know Duke's the game master, so does that mean the game would be perfect if he reviewed it? He'd never have to restart the missions. We know that. Hmmm. I'll take into account next time I read a review that your skills on playing a game determines whether, or not it'll be perfect. I'm not some crazy fan of GTA that wants GTA to be perfect, but I feel you guy's should rate games A+. A review is an opinion not a fact, so give your opinion that you feel a game is the best game you've played so far. I don't want to ramble, so I'll end this. Also one last thing. "Restarting missions is never fun" I'm not quite sure, but shouldn't that be "Restarting missions are never fun" Like I said though, i'm not exactly sure. Hrm.